English as the Medium of Instruction in Saudi Higher Education: Necessity or Hegemony?

Abdallah H. Al-Kahtany, Syed Md Golam Faruk, Abdul Wahed Q. Al Zumor

Abstract


English has been implemented as the medium of instruction of engineering, medicine and science in Saudi universities. This decision was taken by some universities without consultation with students or teaching staff, and stands in violation of the Saudi policy that states that Arabic should be the language of instruction. This study investigates the attitude of 702 Saudi students and 162 instructors towards English as the medium of instruction, and towards Arabic as an alternative. The Component of Attitude and the Theory of Reasoned Behavior were adopted to analyze the findings. It explores the consequences of these choices based on theories regarding functions of attitude among students and instructors of the Science Colleges in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia. Sub-themes include the effectiveness of English as the medium of instruction for Saudi students; the consequences of imposing English as the medium of instruction; the potential of Arabic as the medium of instruction in higher education, and students’ right to be taught in their own mother tongue. Both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection were used based on a questionnaire survey. Findings show strong attitudinal differences between students and instructors, which may be attributed to the degree of hegemony affecting the groups.


Keywords


hegemony; Saudi Arabia; English; Arabic; attitudes; higher education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alamri, Abdulrahman Ali M. (2008). An Evaluation of the Sixth Grade English Language Textbook for Saudi Boys' School, http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/amri/Documents/MA thesis.pdf (accessed 23/3/2015).

Al-Haq, Fawaz Al-Abed and Amer Lahad Al-Masaeid. (2009). "Islam and language planning in the Arab world: A case study in Jordan". Iranian Journal of Language Studies: 3.3, 267-302

Al-Kahtany, A.H. (2013). Linguistic Hegemony: English in Higher Education. Unpublished manuscript.

Amin, T. G. (2009). Language of instruction and science education in the Arab World: Toward a situated research agenda. In S. BouJaoude and Z. Dagher (Eds.), The world of science education: Arab states, (pp. 61-82). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Introduction. In Reclaiming the local in the language policy and practice, ed. A. S. Canagarajah, xiii-xxx. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Collins, J. (1989). Hegemonic practice: Literacy and standard language in public education. Journal of Education 171, 9–34.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and Power: On the Relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Fontana, B. (2001). Hegemony and rhetoric: Political education in Gramsci. In Joseph A. Buttigieg and Peter Mayo (eds) Gramsci and Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Gardner, R., Lalonde, M., & Moorcroft, R. (1985). The Role of Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning: Correlational and Experimental Considerations. Language Learning, 35(2), 207-227.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01025.x

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (eds and trans.). New York: International Publishers.

Gramsci, A. (1985) Selections from Cultural Writings. David Forgacs and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (eds) and William Boelhower (trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Gramsci, A. (1995). Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Derek Boothman (ed. and trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Guo, Yan; Beckett, Gulbahar H. (2007). The Hegemony of English as a Global Language: Reclaiming Local Knowledge and Culture in China. Convergence, v40 n1-2, p117-132.

Kontra, M. R. Phillipson, T. SkutnabbKangas, and T. Várady. (1999). "Conceptualising and Implementing Linguistic Human Rights". Language: A Right and a Resource—Approaching Linguistic Human Rights (ed. M. Kontra, Phillipson, R. T. SkutnabbKangas, and T. Várady). Budapest: Central European University Press.

Mackenzie, C. (2010). Autonomy: Individualistic or social and relational. in (eds) G. Marston, J. Moss & J. Quiggin (Eds)., Risk, responsibility and the welfare state (pp 107-127).

Pennycook, Alastair. (1994). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In Intergroup behaviour, eds. J. Turner and H. Giles, 144–165. Oxford: Blackwell.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR, ISSN 1798-4769)
Copyright © 2015-2018 ACADEMY PUBLICATION — All Rights Reserved