Developing Critical Reading of Argumentative Text: Effects of a Comprehension Strategy Intervention

Michael Tengberg, Christina Olin-Scheller

Abstract


This article reports a single-group intervention study designed to improve critical reading proficiency among adolescents. Critical reading in the study is defined as 1) being able to identify written argumentative structure; 2) being able to analyze arguments in terms of relevance and sustainability; and 3) being able to evaluate argumentation through written, critical response. A multiple strategy approach for critical reading instruction was implemented over the course of six weeks (15 lessons) in four classes in Swedish 9th grade (N=74). Classroom activities included reading of argumentative texts, teacher modeling of three strategies (identifying, analyzing, and evaluating), frequent discussions, and response writing to argumentative texts. Results indicated that low and middle achievers made significant and large improvements from pretest to posttest, while for high achievers the intervention seemed to have no effect at all. Closer analysis also revealed that the ability to analyze arguments accounted for the largest proportion of improvement.

Keywords


argumentative text; critical reading; comprehensions strategies; dialogue; intervention study

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afflerbach, P. P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies.The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1

Alexander, P. A. (2006). The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(4), 413¬¬–436.

Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 314–351.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747620

Almasi, J. F. & Hart, S. J. (2011). Best practices in comprehension instruction. In L. M. Morrow & L. B. Gambrell (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction, 4th ed. (pp. 250–275). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Tengberg, M., Olin-Scheller, C., & Lindholm, A. (2015).Improving students' narrative comprehension through a multiple strategy approach.Effects of dialogic strategy instruction in secondary school.L1–Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 15, 1–25.

http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.01

Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999).Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement.Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination.Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (M. Holquist Ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Block, C. C., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, Vol. 2 (pp. 19–37). New York: Guilford Press.

Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategy instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 18–37.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.18

Chambliss, M.(1994). Why do readers fail to change their beliefs after reading persuasive text? In R. Garner & P.A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 75–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chambliss, M. (1995).Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 778–807.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748198

Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind.American Educator, 22(1–2), 8–15.

Crowhurst, M. (1991).Interrelationships between reading and writng persuasive discourse.Research in the Teaching of English,25(3), 314–338

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002).Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/0872071774.10

Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge forinference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.774005

Eriksen, A., & Roe, A. (2011). Den nasjonale prøven i lesing på 8. og 9. trinn, 2011. Rapport basert på populasjonsdata. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.

Eriksen, A., & Roe, A. (2012). Den nasjonale prøven i lesing på 8. og 9. trinn, 2012. Rapport basert på populasjonsdata. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.

Eriksen, A., & Roe, A. (2013). Den nasjonale prøven i lesing på 8. og 9. trinn, 2013. Rapport basert på populasjonsdata. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.

Freebody, P.,& Freiberg, J.(2011). The teaching and learning of critical literacy: Beyond the "Show of wisdom". In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. IV (pp. 432–452). London: Routledge.

Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities.A review of research.Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279

Gottfried, A. W., Schlackman, J., Gottfried, A. E., & Martinez, A. S. (2015). Parental provision of early literacy environment as related to reading and educational outcomes across the academic life-span. Parenting: Science and Practice, 15, 24–38.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2015.992736

Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Haria, P., MacArthur, C., & Edwards Santoro, L. (2010). The Effects of Teaching a Text-Structure Based Reading Comprehension Strategy on Struggling Fifth Grade Students' Ability to Summarize and Analyze Written Arguments. Paper presented at the SREE Conference, Research into Practice, Washington, D.C., March 4–6, 2010.

Headley, K. (2008). Improving reading comprehension through writing. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, Vol. 2 (pp. 214–225). New York: Guilford Press.

Hobbs, R.,& Frost, R. (2003).Measuring the acquisition of media-literacy skills.Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 330–355.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.3.2

Israel, S.E., Block, C.B., Bauserman, K.L. & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (Eds.) (2005). Metacognition in Literacy Learning.Theory, Assessment, Instruction, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

Janks, H (2010). Literacy and power.New York and London: Routledge.

Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Couzijn, M. (2009). Self-questioning in the literature classroom.effects on students' interpretation and appreciation of short stories. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 9(1), 91–116.

Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. (2009). Examining reading: Research and practice in assessing second language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Knudsen, R.E. (1992). Analysis of argumentative writing at two grade levels.Journal of Educational Research, 85, 169-179.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9944434

Larson, M., Britt, M.A., & Larson, A.A. (2004).Disfluencies in comprehending argumentative texts.Reading Psychology, 25, 205-224.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710490489908

Luke, A. (1988). Literacy, textbooks and ideology: Postwar literacy instruction and the mythology of Dick and Jane. London: Falmer Press.

Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems, Parts 1 and 2. In B.K. Britton &J. Black (Eds.), Understandingexpository text (pp.11–64, 269–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read.An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction [online].Retrived March 29, 2016, fromhttp://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf.

Newell, G.E., Beach, R., Smith, J. & VanDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and Learning Argumentative Reading and Writing: A Review of Research. Reading Research Quarterly46(3), 273–304.

Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating Humanity.A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects readingcomprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412.

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R. & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

OECD (2009). PISA 2009 Assessment framework.Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science.Retrived March 29, 2016, fromhttp://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf.

OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn – student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III). Retrived March 29, 2016, fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264083943-en

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

Parodi, G. (2007). Reading–writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9029-7

Pressley, M., Beard El-Dinary, P., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92(5), 513–555.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/461705

Prior, P. (2005). Toward the ethnography of argumentation: A response to Richard Andrews' 'Models of argumentationin educational discourse.' Text, 25(1), 129–144.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129

Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R.C., & Kuo, L. (2007). Teaching and learning argumentation.The Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 449–472.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/518623

Roe, A. (2014). Den nasjonale prøven i lesing på 8. og 9. trinn, 2014. Rapport basert på populasjonsdata. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research,64(4), 479–530.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479

Saunders, T. J. (1987). Introduction to Socrates.In Plato, Early Socratic Dialogues (pp. 13-36). London: Penguin Books.

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Skaftun, A. (2011). Understanding reading development: A phenomenological perspective. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 11, 127–148.

http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2011.01.08

Soter A. O., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Murphy, P. K., Rudge, L., Reninger, K. B., & Edwards, M. (2008). What the Discourse Tells Us: Talk and Indicators of High-Level Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372−391.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001

Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction19(3), 272–286.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003

Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Vagle, W., & Roe, A. (2010). Den nasjonale prøven i lesing på 8. og 9. trinn, 2010. Rapport basert på populasjonsdata. Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleforskning. Universitetet i Oslo.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wilkinson, I.A.G. & Son, E.H. (2012). A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. IV (pp. 359–387). London: Routledge.

Wong, B. Y. L., Kuperis, S., Jamieson, D., Keller, L. & Cull-Hewitt, R. (2002). Effects of guided journal writing on students' story understanding. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 179–191.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596588




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.02

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Language Teaching and Research (JLTR, ISSN 1798-4769)
Copyright © 2015-2018 ACADEMY PUBLICATION — All Rights Reserved