The Effects of Self- and Peer-assessment on Iranian EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing Performance

Hamid Reza Iraji, Mostafa Janebi Enayat, Mahyar Momeni

Abstract


Alternative assessments have increasingly gained attention in L2 writing. One of the areas of research which has received much attention in the literature of ELT is the use of self- and peer-assessments and their effects on developing the writing ability of ESL/EFL learners. The purpose of this study was to find the effect of self- and peer-assessments on the argumentative writing performance of intermediate Iranian EFL learners. For this purpose, 36 intermediate EFL students were selected and homogenized based on the results of Oxford Quick Placement Test and an argumentative writing which served as the pre-test of this study. They were then randomly assigned into control and experimental groups to receive different treatments. The compositions of participants in the control group were assessed using traditional teacher-assessment while for the experimental group, self- and peer-assessments were used writing assessment. The results of post-test indicated that the use of self- and peer-assessments significantly affected the writing ability of the learners. Based on the obtained results, it was concluded that using alternative assessments for Iranian EFL students could be helpful in overcoming some of their argumentative writing difficulties. The results of this study have clear implications for both learners and teachers and other stakeholders of ELT. They can use these alternative assessments as a learning opportunity to lower the anxiety and improve the argumentative writing skill of the students. s, but they were permanently different in illocutionary acts. Finally, in terms of perlocutionary acts, the candidates were mostly intended to get the hearers know by their assertion, explanation, clarification, argumentation, etc.

Keywords


argumentative writing; assessment; alternative assessment; self-assessment; peer-assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abolfazli Khonbi, Z., Sadeghi, K. (2012). The Effect of Assessment Type (self vs. peer vs. teacher) on Iranian University EFL Students' Course Achievement. Language Testing in Asia, 2(4), 47-74.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-2-4-47

Ahangari, S., Rassekh-Alqol, B., & Akbari Hamed, L. (2013). The Effect of Peer Assessment on Oral Presentation in an EFL Context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature 2(3), 45-54.

http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.45

Ariafar, M., & Fatemipour, H.R. (2013). The Effect of Self-Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners' Speaking Skill. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(4), 7-15.

Besharati, C. (2004). The impact of alternative assessment techniques on Iranian students' achievments in listening comprehension skill. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Tehran: Alzahra University .

Birjandi, P., & Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2010). The Role of Self-assessment in Promoting Iranian EFL Learners' Motivation. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 211-220.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n3p211

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco State University: Longman.

Chen, Y. M. (2008). Learning to assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 235-262.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086293

Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Lnaguage Testing, 22(3), 93-121.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt298oa

Dikel, M. R. (2005). A guide to going online for self-assessment tools. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from: // www.rileyguide.com/assess.html.

Dyer, B. (1996). L1 and L2 composition theories: Hillocks' environmental mode and task-based language teaching. ELT Journal, 50(4), 312-317.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.4.312

Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the priciples, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.

Firooz Zareh, A. R. (2006). The effectiveness of alternative assessment and traditional methods of testing on Iranian EFL adult learners' reading comprehency. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University .

Freeman, M. (1995). Peer-assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289-299.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293950200305

Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212-226.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002695

Heinelman, L. K. (1990). Self-assessment of second language ability: The role of response effects. Language Teaching, 7(2), 174-201.

Huerta-Macias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Response to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8-10.

Hughes, I.E., & Large, B.J. (1993). Staff- and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 379-385.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079312331382281

Hunt, J., Gow, L., & Barnes, P. (1989). Learner self-education and assessment: A tool for autonomy in the language learning classroom. In V. Bickley (Ed.), Language teaching and learning styles within and across cultures (pp. 207-217). Hong Kong: Institute of Language in Education, Education Department.

Javaherbakhsh, M.R. (2010). The Impact of Self-Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners' Writing Skill. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 213-218.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n2p213

Javaherbakhsh, M.R. (2010). The Impact of Self-Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners' Writing Skill. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 213-218.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n2p213

Kavaliauskiene, G. (2004). Quality Assessment in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. ESP World. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from: http://esp-world.info/Articles.

Liang, J. (2006). Overview of Self-assessment in the Second Language Writing Classroom. Paper presented at the 2006 TESOL Convention, Tampa, Florida. Retrieved March 23, 2015, from: http://secondlanguage writing.com/documents/overview.doc.

Marandi, S. (2002). Contrastive EAP rhetoric: Metadiscourse in Persian vs. English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tehran: Tehran.

Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, Peer-, and Teacher- assessments in Japanese University EFL Writing Classrooms. Language Testing, 29(1), 75-100.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097337

Matsuno, S. (2009). Self-, Peer-, and Teacher- assessments in Japanese University EFL Writing Classrooms. Language Testing, 29(1), 75-100.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097337

Meihami, H., & Varmaghani, Z. (2013). The Implementation of Self-Assessment in EFL Writing Classroom: An Experimental Study. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 9, 39-48.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.9.39

Mendonca, C.O., & Johnson, K.E. (1994). Peer-review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587558

Oskarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6, 1-13.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600103

Prior, P. (2005). Toward the ethnography of argumentation: A response to Richard Andrews' 'Models of argumentation in educational discourse. Text, 25(1), 129-144.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.129

Reznitskaya, A., & Anderson, R. C. (2002). The argument schema and learning to reason. In C. C. Block and M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 319-334). New York: Guilford.

Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experimental factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1-19.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the "good language learner" can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586011

Sullivan, K. & Hall, C. (1997). Introducing Students to Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22 (3), 1-15.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293970220303

Taras, M. (2001). The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 605-614.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930120093922

Topping, K. 1998, Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities, Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249

Toulmin, S.E. (2006). Reasoning in theory and practice. In D. Hitchcock and B. Verheij (Eds.), Arguing on the Toulmin model: New essays in argument analysis and evaluation (pp. 25-29). Dordrecht: Springer.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_2

Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Merrienboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20, 270-279.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0604.08

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Theory and Practice in Language Studies (TPLS, ISSN 1799-2591)
Copyright © 2015-2017 ACADEMY PUBLICATION — All Rights Reserved